Key Facts and Figures
 |
At
the end of May 2003, 1,046 women were held on remand .
They accounted for almost a quarter (23 per cent) of the
total female prison population
|
 |
One in five women on remand
are acquitted altogether.
|
 |
Women
on remand is one of the fastest growing groups within
the prison population with a 35 per cent increase in numbers
between 2000 and 2002. |
 |
Over half (58 per cent) of women
remanded into custody do not subsequently receive a
custodial sentence.
|
 |
In
2001, 11,900 women were received into custody; 4,600 under
sentence and 7,200 on remand. Thus, while remand prisoners
comprised a fifth (21 per cent) of the average female
population during 2001, they made up nearly two-thirds
(61 per cent) of the women who entered prison custody
that year. |
 |
40 per cent of women on remand
have received help or treatment for a mental health
problem in the year before imprisonment. Remanded women
are twice as likely as sentenced women to have been
admitted previously to a locked ward or secure unit.
|
 |
Almost
half (45 per cent) of women received into prison on remand
in 2001 were there for theft or fraud. |
 |
More than forty per cent of
women on remand have attempted suicide before entering
prison.
|
 |
The
average time women spend in custody awaiting trial is
39 days.
|
 |
Each
year up to 17,000 children are separated from their
mothers by imprisonment.
|
Forthcoming Women on Remand Report
Research to be published by the Prison Reform Trust later
this year will highlight the conditions and issues faced by
women on remand. The study, supported by the Open Door Womens
Trust, will reveal that access to bail information is dependent
on where a woman is imprisoned and that justice for these
women is a postcode lottery.
Prison Service regulations (PSO 610) state that each prison
that holds prisoners on remand is mandated to provide a Bail
Information Scheme. The role of Bail Information Officers
is to gather evidence to show that the accused can safely
be released on bail.
The Prison Reform Trust study will show that the proportion
of remanded women who were interviewed by a bail information
officer ranged from 94 per cent in Styal prison and 90 per
cent in Low Newton to none in Brockhill and Holloway. Women
in HMP Holloway, which holds the highest number of women on
remand, are the least likely to be interviewed.
The study reveals that the failure of the Prison Service to
achieve the provision of bail information at the same standard
set by Styal has cost the Service over £1.6m over six
months (calculation on the basis of 426 prisoners for 39 days
at a cost of £95 per day).
It concludes that continuing to hold women in prisons that
lack an effective, fully functioning bail information scheme
may breach their human rights as it amounts to arbitrary detention.The
report will make the following recommendations:
- The Government and Judiciary must
recognise that a significant reduction in the use of remand
is vital and possible. As the majority of women on remand
do not go on to receive a prison sentence, they should not
be imprisoned in the first place.
- Children and young people, under
18 years old, should never be remanded into Prison Service
custody.
- Increased provision of mental health
services and drug treatment in the community would clearly
have a beneficial impact on the womens remand population.
- The needed increase in suitable
places for women in bail hostels should be provided by small,
local centres which are able to meet the needs of women
who come into contact with the criminal justice system.
Bail hostels should develop greater provision for support
(particularly in drug treatment and mental health) as a
way of improving service and increasing occupancy rates.
- All courts should have full-time
bail information staff. All prisons holding women on remand
should have a fully functioning bail information scheme.
The use of bail support in female prison establishments
should be expanded.
- First night in custody arrangements
should be extended to all prisons, with no restrictions
put in place regarding how many times a person has been
in prison previously.
Abby's
story
Abby (not her real name) was 34
years old when she was charged with armed robbery and
remanded into custody. She had not been in custody previously
and had been in employment until a year previously when
she was signed off sick with an eating disorder. She had
a 4 year old child who lived with her, and was three months
pregnant.
Abby had been using heroin but at the point of arrest
was on a prescribed methadone programme. At her first
appearance bail was refused on the grounds that she may
fail to surrender and may commit further offences, despite
her address being verified and surety offered. The second
application was refused on the same grounds. The third
application for bail was heard by a High Court Judge who
again refused bail but said that bail would be considered
if a hostel placement was found.
Abby became very distraught and emotionally disturbed
due to her imprisonment. There had been no clear evidence
to suggest that she would fail to surrender or commit
further offences. On the fourth application, again to
a High Court judge, she was bailed to hostel accommodation
having spent a month in custody. |
|